In a series of recent enforcement actions, the SEC has held investment advisers responsible for performance claims included in their marketing materials that they received from sub-advisers and that turned out to be false and misleading. Although the SEC acknowledged that the investment advisers may have been unaware that the performance information was false and misleading, the regulator concluded that they were nevertheless responsible for ensuring that the overall reported performance record from their sub-advisers was compliant with the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. To avoid running afoul of applicable law, investment advisers conveying third-party performance returns should obtain adequate documentation to verify their accuracy and establish policies and procedures that govern what due diligence they will conduct on the sub-advisers’ performance. In a guest article, Daniel G. Viola, partner at Sadis & Goldberg, and Antonella Puca, head of the investment performance attestation practice at RSM US, review the key aspects of the recent enforcement activity of the SEC on performance advertising and provide guidance on how to address some of the SEC’s concerns. For additional insight from Viola, see “Hedge Fund Managers Advised to Prepare for Imminent SEC Examination” (Jan. 28, 2016). For more on performance advertising, see “The SEC’s Recent Revisions to Form ADV and the Recordkeeping Rule: What Investment Advisers Need to Know About Retaining Performance Records (Part Two of Two)” (Nov. 17, 2016); and “Liquidity and Performance Representations Present Potential Pitfalls for Hedge Fund Managers” (Mar. 31, 2016).
Dec. 1, 2016
-
TOPICS
-
ENTITIES
-
PEOPLE
How Investment Managers Can Advertise Sub-Adviser Performance Without Violating SEC Rules
To read the full article
Continue reading your article with a PELR subscription.
Other Performance Advertising Articles
-
Oct. 25, 2022
Reconciling Disparate U.S. and U.K. Requirements for Preparing and Delivering Non‑Standard Track Records (Part Two of Two) -
Mar. 22, 2022
Eleven “Top of Mind” Questions and Misconceptions Surrounding the New Marketing Rule -
Nov. 9, 2021
Issues and Tips for Complying With FINRA’s GIPS Mandate and the SEC’s Marketing Rule (Part Two of Two) -
Nov. 2, 2021
Investors’ Increased Use of Outsourced Chief Investment Officers and Greater GIPS Compliance Adoption (Part One of Two) -
Jun. 29, 2021
Marketing Rule and Non‑Standard Track Records: Using Related, Extracted and Predecessor Performance (Part Two of Two)